PUBLIC NOTICE OF RECORDING - LAPD WARRANT AUDIT

PUBLIC NOTICE OF RECORDING

Comprehensive Warrant Audit, Discovery Demand & Judicial Response Filings

Record No.: SR-2025-1110-022

Date of Execution: November 10, 2025

Date of Public Recording: 

PURPOSE OF NOTICE

This notice serves as official publication and lawful preservation of the following filings and exhibits submitted by Daevon-Jerrielle: Taylor, a living man, sui juris, acting in private capacity as Executor and Administrator of the Daevon Jerrielle Taylor Private Trust. The documents collectively constitute a Comprehensive Warrant Audit & Records Demand, served upon multiple Los Angeles County and City agencies, and corresponding judicial motion filings concerning the defective warrant and due-process violations arising under the criminal matter People v. Taylor (24CJCF03632) and related family-law case 24IWRO00223

SUMMARY OF FILINGS

Comprehensive Audit & Records Demand / Notice of Liability (“Warrant Audit — Nov 10 2025”)

Filed and served upon:

• Los Angeles Superior Court (Inglewood Family Law & Criminal Divisions)

• Los Angeles County District Attorney’s Office – Anthony Ellis, Deputy DA

• LAPD Records & Discovery Sections

• LASD Warrant System & Court Services Division

• Judicial Council Audit Services Unit and Commission on Judicial Performance

This filing demands complete disclosure, certification, and audit trails for the April 18 2024 defective arrest warrant lacking a case number, judicial signature, or clerk certification—rendering it void under constitutional and statutory law.

The notice references LAPD Board Report No. 24-131 (“Warrant Applications Audit,” June 25 2024) showing system-wide non-compliance, with fewer than 80 percent of warrants properly logged or reviewed

It cites and preserves rights under:

• Cal. Const. Art. I § 3(b) (Right of Access to Records)

• Gov. Code §§ 7920 et seq. (CPRA)

• Penal Code §§ 1054.1 – 1054.5 (Discovery)

• CCP § 473(d) (Void Judgments Correction)

• Brady v. Maryland (1963) 373 U.S. 83 & Franks v. Delaware (1978) 438 U.S. 154

Each agency is ordered to preserve all emails, CMS logs, audit trails, and metadata. Destruction after notice constitutes spoliation and obstruction of justice.

Exhibit A — Warrant Audit & Defective Instrument Analysis

Supporting charts and document scans demonstrate:

• The alleged “warrant” bears no judicial signature, required oaths, Seals or "filed" stamps;

• No case number or department code appears;

• Chain-of-custody inconsistencies across LASC, LAPD, and DA records;

• Violations of Penal Code § 1526 and Rule 10.500 CRC regarding certification.

This exhibit forms the evidentiary basis for administrative and civil accountability claims against participating officers and clerks.

NOTICE OF LIABILITY AND RESPONSE DEADLINE

All recipients—judicial officers, clerks, law-enforcement agencies, and prosecuting counsel—are hereby placed on Notice of Liability for:

• Violations of discovery and disclosure statutes;

• Misrepresentation of judicial instruments;

• Failure to correct known defects upon notice.

Each agency shall issue acknowledgment within 10 days and complete production within the statutory deadlines under Gov. Code § 7922.535(a). Failure to respond constitutes tacit admission and default under commercial and common-law notice principles.

LAWFUL RESERVATION OF RIGHTS

This record is published under reservation of rights pursuant to:

• U.C.C. § 1-308 / 1-103.6

• Cal. Const. Art. I §§ 7 & 24

• 42 U.S.C. § 1983 & 18 U.S.C. §§ 241–242

• Rule 10.500 CRC and Gov. Code § 6259(d)

Nothing herein shall be construed as consent to jurisdiction or waiver of private rights.

Notice to Agent is Notice to Principal / Notice to Principal is Notice to Agent.

RECORDED BY

Daevon-Jerrielle: TaylorA Living Man — sui juris — Executor & Private Administratorc/o 335 E Albertoni St Ste 200 PMB 8Carson, California Republic 90746 (Without the U.S.)✉ dtaylor@nlsh.org