Fraudulent Prosecution & Fabricated Evidence in Malicious Prosecution Case at Clara Shortridge Criminal Justice Center Case №24CJCF03632.

"D. Taylor Files 995 Motion for Fraudulent Use of Nonexistent Felony Records and Prosecutorial Misconduct in Case №24CJCF03632”

By Daevon-Jerrielle: Taylor, A Living Man Date: July 30, 2025 

Published in the interest of truth, due process, and the protection of fundamental rights.

Case Summary

On July 8, 2025, a Penal Code § 995 Motion to Dismiss in the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, challenging the false and unsupported charges filed against me under PC § 29800(a)(1) (alleged felon in possession of a firearm).

The prosecution falsely alleges I was previously convicted of a felony — a claim that is untrue, unverified, and unsupported by any certified record.

I appear specially, not generally, as a living man, reserving all constitutional and natural rights under UCC 1–308 and Article I of the U.S. and California Constitutions. I reject all unlawful attempts to fabricate criminal liability.

The Motion

The original § 995 Motion demands dismissal of all four counts of PC § 29800(a)(1) on the following grounds:

• Lack of probable cause

• Absence of any certified or lawful felony conviction

• Use of fraudulent and unserved documentation to sustain the charges

VIEW OR DOWNLOAD OFFICIAL 995 MOTION FILINGS BELOW

• June 26, 2025 ( 995 Motion Filing )

• June 26, 2025 ( Declaration in Support Of 995 motion )
  

Supplemental Exhibit Submission

A Supplemental Filing is being filed today August 1, to support the § 995 Motion filed June 26, 2025. These new exhibits includes:

DOWNLOAD PDF COPYS OF AUGUST 1, 2025 FILINGS BELOW

• SUPPLEMENTAL EXHIBIT FILING IN SUPPORT OF 995 MOTION

• Exhibit A: Minute Order referencing a RAP sheet that was never shown or served

• Exhibit B: Certified record proving the prior case used to justify the charge was dismissed, not convicted

Key Findings and Violations

Fraudulent Evidence Introduced:

• Prosecution referenced a “RAP sheet” allegedly confirming a felony

• No such record was ever filed in court or served upon me

• This violates due process and Penal Code §§ 866(b), 1054.1
  

Lack of Jurisdiction:

• No valid felony conviction = No jurisdiction under PC § 29800(a)(1)

• Per People v. Cegers (1992) 7 Cal.App.4th 988: charges are void without proof of felony
  

Withheld Exculpatory Evidence:

• Prior case dismissal (Exhibit B) was not disclosed

• This is a Brady violation and may constitute fraud upon the court

• 
  

Notice of Liability

Those involved may face legal consequences under:

• 42 U.S.C. § 1983 — Civil rights deprivation under color of law

• Cal. Civil Code § 1709 — Fraud and deceit

• Cal. Penal Code § 132 — Submitting false evidence
  

Relief Requested

1. Dismiss all PC § 29800(a)(1) charges under Penal Code § 995

2. Strike all references to unserved or unverified felony records

3. Suppress any evidence obtained via invalid warrants or falsehoods
   

Supporting Documents

• Exhibit A: Minute Order referencing nonexistent RAP sheet

• Exhibit B: Certified dismissal of alleged felony

• 
  

Broader Context

This case forms part of a larger pattern involving:

• Civil and federal actions I have initiated against financial and municipal entities

• A fraudulent search warrant executed on June 5, 2024

• Ongoing chemical exposure, EMF targeting, and aerial surveillance

• Documented and reported to environmental and federal agencies

These criminal charges are being used as a tool for retaliation and cover-up.

Final Statement

This case is a live demonstration of how convictions can be fabricated, how due process is denied, and why the People must hold institutions accountable.

My fight is not just mine — it is a stand for truth, justice, and liberty.

Submitted By: Daevon-Jerrielle: Taylor, A Living Man In Propria Persona, Sui Juris c/o 335 E Albertoni St, Ste 200 PMB 8 Carson, California (non-domestic) Without the U.S. UCC 1–308 — All Rights Reserved — Without Prejudice